GOVERNANCE & PARTNERSHIPClarifying a public-nonprofit relationship
The challenge: A park foundation preparing for leadership transitions needed greater clarity around governance, financial practices, fundraising, and its relationship with the public agency it supports.
KORE's work: Reviewed a draft memorandum of understanding and existing practices, then developed recommendations addressing roles, board independence, financial governance, and future organizational development.
The value: Leadership received a practical framework for internal discussion and a clearer path for strengthening the partnership.
RESEARCH & ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGYTurning peer research into decision support
The challenge: A public agency wanted a clearer picture of how park foundations across the country are structured, funded, governed, and connected to their agency partners.
KORE's work: Gathered and analyzed national survey and organizational data, compared peer foundations, and translated the findings into a usable research foundation for local decision-making.
The value: Leaders gained external benchmarks and evidence they could use to evaluate options in their own community.
STRATEGIC PLANNINGBuilding plans boards can actually use
The challenge: Boards often know the issues they face but need a disciplined process for choosing priorities and defining what success looks like.
KORE's work: Facilitates multi-month planning processes combining stakeholder input, board discussion, organizational realities, clear goals, and implementation responsibilities.
The value: A practical roadmap that supports board decisions and ongoing accountability rather than a plan that ends when the retreat does.
ASSOCIATION TECHNOLOGYMaking systems serve the organization
The challenge: Association technology can accumulate over time without a clear connection to member experience, workflow, or organizational priorities.
KORE's work: Helps leaders evaluate AMS and related systems through the lens of actual business needs, data quality, staff workflow, member communications, and implementation capacity.
The value: Technology decisions begin with the association's work and its people, rather than with a feature list.